Jennifer Golden is Director of Monitoring & Evaluation at the World Cocoa Foundation

SeaWeb: What do you think is the future of traceability and transparency?

Jennifer Golden: Before talking about traceability and transparency we need to differentiate the two. Traceability refers to tracing the product throughout the value supply chain; whereas transparency can relate to the sharing of all types of data and information – with respect to financial flows, sustainability practices, impact, and so on.  There is a trend toward more of both which is driven by increased demand from companies throughout the value chain, consumers, civil society organizations, governments and other stakeholders. In terms of traceability one issue will continue to be the value-add of traceability as compared to the cost associated with tracing back from the chocolate bar up the value chain throughout the different touchpoints to the smallholder farmer. There are some innovations especially in technology that have potential to close this gap.  

SeaWeb: How does your company, or your client companies, think about traceability? Do they think about it mainly in terms of supply chain management, or as a way to communicate to the marketplace?   

Jennifer Golden: Cocoa and chocolate companies think about transparency with respect to both supply chain management in order to be able to follow the consignments of product through from the cocoa on the farm to the end user and also to be able to communicate to business and/or consumer customers. The importance of traceability increases with risk associated in the supply chain (could be risks associated with the quality of a product, or practices associated with the development of the product, etc.)

SW: How should companies think about traceability and transparency?   

Jennifer Golden: As a first step, companies should think about what the purpose of traceability and/or transparency is for their organization.  Neither is an ‘end’ in and of itself but rather a ‘means’ toward something else.  Traceability may be used to ensure that the supply chain is in compliance with certain declared practices.  Having this traceability may then enable transparency to be able to openly report outside the organization on the practices.  And this transparency then will enable accountability by the company that it is acting in a manner aligned with what it communicates in terms e.g., of a social impact commitment.  Once determining the specific objectives, it will also enable a company to then map out the supply chain and determine where the greatest risk areas are to then determine in which areas traceability is most crucial.  Without doing some of this initial framing and prioritizing, companies may end up spending a lot of extra money and time to build in traceability in areas that are not crucial.

SW: What are some examples of companies getting market value from traceability?

Jennifer Golden: In the cocoa/chocolate value chain there is an increased move towards traceability/transparency.  One indication relates to the use of certification schemes by cocoa and chocolate companies.  In addition, companies have their own sustainable sourcing programs which emphasize traceability and in turn transparency of company practices and practices by those throughout the value chain.  For example, Mondelez tracks farmer volume and premium in its Cocoa Life Program.  Further, it is very transparent in sharing its progress, results and learnings.  Lindt & Sprungli emphasizes knowing where the beans come from in its sustainability program, and TCHO’s business model revolves around partnering directly with the cocoa producers.  These examples show the increasing focus on tracing the ‘bean to bar’.  These and many more emphasize the move towards more transparency by companies of their practices and results.  When a differentiator, these actions help companies get market value.

Related content

Science you can use: supply chain transparency

Key papers: CONSUMER TRUST GlobeScan. 2017. Trust and Transparency In the Supply Chain. GlobeScan eBrief. 5pp.“Diminishing trust in a range of institutions has become a central issue, especially when it comes to the relationships between business and...

Target: a case study on transparency

“Being able to show year-over-year progress against a baseline, and being able to speak to this movement (positive or not as positive) is essential to maintaining authenticity and transparency with stakeholders” —Jill Davies, Target Different supply chains have...

Supply chain transparency and seafood

“If we are all going to have to get naked, we might as well get buff.” This quote from Andy Ruben, the first CSO of Walmart, is in reference to transparency. The statement came up during our interviews with companies who have already begun their journey toward greater...

Supply chain transparency: a panel interview with the experts

We sat down with experts and innovators of supply chain transparency, in seafood and beyond, to better understand the value proposition for pursuing and achieving transparency. We wanted to understand how companies are treating transparency as a business opportunity...

The case for transparency: an interview with Julie Kuchepatov

Julie Kuchepatov is Seafood Director at Fair Trade USA SeaWeb: What do you think is the future of traceability and transparency? Julie Kuchepatov: Full traceability allows seafood products to be traced throughout the supply chain back to the point of harvest....

The case for transparency: an interview with Chris Brown

Chris Brown is Senior Director Sustainable Business at Asda SeaWeb: What do you think is the future of traceability and transparency? Chris Brown: This area is going to be a high priority for all types of food chains. Seafood has had to develop with IUU regulations...

The case for transparency: an interview with Melissa Garren

Melissa Garren is Chief Scientific Officer of Pelagic Data Systems   SeaWeb: What do you think is the future of traceability and transparency? Melissa Garren:  The marketplace expectations for traceability and transparency seem destined to grow, especially...

Environmental Defense Fund and Walmart: a case study on transparency

Since setting up an office in Bentonville, Arkansas, in 2007, the Environmental Defense Fund has made impressive strides with Walmart to improve the social and environmental sustainability and responsibility of their myriad supply chains. By setting big-picture goals, and identifying environmental and social hot spots in supply chains, even large-scale retailers can change significantly for the better.

Blueyou: a case study on transparency

In February 2017, Blueyou announced the first dual-certified Fair Trade and MSC seafood product: canned skipjack tuna fished from the Maldives. The Maldives is square in the middle of the Indian Ocean—an area heavily fraught with fisheries management challenges. So how, and why, did Blueyou manage to improve transparency in their supply chains, achieving dual certification, for one of the most challenging species and regions?

Ocean Disclosure Project: a case study on transparency

In April, 2017 the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership announced that, through its Ocean Disclosure Project (ODP), US retailer Publix would move to publish a list of all of the fisheries from which they source seafood, as well as information on management at those fisheries, catch method, and environmental impact.

Key Resources

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons